feathersfly: (Default)
Hawks ([personal profile] feathersfly) wrote2021-06-07 02:08 am

IC Inbox



"Hey, you've reached Hawks! Guess I'm busy right now. Drop me a message and I'll get back to you."
nastyboy: (I feel bad for anyone who has ever)

[personal profile] nastyboy 2022-04-10 02:12 am (UTC)(link)
[You know what - he'll take that. He'll take "this device PROBABLY does not use explosive substance to stay airborne". Dimitri recognizes that he cannot be picky.]

I suppose you do have a good point there.

It is interesting, applying what I know of regular seaborne ships to one that goes through the air in an attempt to plan better for whatever may happen with it. For a seaborne ship, there is a real concern of water going up through the ship and people drowning. There is technically still that concern for this scenario, but it seems like the last issue to hit us if the ship starts to go down.

Having to fight against gravity in order to get to any exit seems as though it would be a larger problem. What do you think?
nastyboy: (Might fuck around and let nature)

[personal profile] nastyboy 2022-04-11 01:49 pm (UTC)(link)
[Sometimes, Dimitri regrets going for a position of leadership and responsibility, even when he doesn't have to. It's not doing great for his stress levels.]

We will be traveling over at least some body of water. Do you think some time would be able to be bought if we hit water instead of ground? It is a ship.
nastyboy: (Barbarian: ...I reckless attack.)

[personal profile] nastyboy 2022-04-16 03:25 am (UTC)(link)
It almost sounds as though it might be simpler for someone to blast through the hull of the ship with a high powered move so that everyone could get out quicker.









I was not being serious there, but I am somewhat frustrated and would like an easy solution.